»
Myanmar »
2018-2022 »
Mid term Evaluation: Strengthening Sustainability of Protected Area Management in Myanmar »
Management Response
Success message
error message
warn message
Mid term Evaluation: Strengthening Sustainability of Protected Area Management in Myanmar
| Commissioning Unit: | Myanmar |
|---|---|
| Evaluation Plan: | 2018-2022 |
| Evaluation Type: | Project |
| Completion Date: | 12/2018 |
| Unit Responsible for providing Management Response: | Myanmar
|
| Documents Related to overall Management Response: |
|
Key Action Update History
Loading..
1. Recommendation:
Recommendation 1 (R1): Undertake a comprehensive, participatory and strategic review of the project design and Results Framework in order to adapt the project to changes in the implementation context, including: (1) reducing the overall scope of work (2) prioritizing interventions that are likely to have greatest sustainable impact by the end of the project; (3) ensuring that project progress and impacts can be measured systematically; (4) updating project risks and assumptions; and (5) systematically recording all major changes to the original project design in the Project
Management Response: [Added: 2019/01/02] [Last Updated: 2019/01/02]
Relevant to: Project Strategy, Implementation & Adaptive Management, Outcomes 1 & 2, Sustainability
Responsible entities: Project Team (PT)/WCS, UNDP, FD
Key Actions:
| Key Action | Responsible | DueDate | Status | Comments | Documents |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1.1: Review, clarify and/or revise objective and outcome level indicators, baselines and targets and ensure these are sufficiently specific, measurable, achievable, relevant and time-bound (i.e. SMART) and that baselines, risk and assumptions are accurate and up to date. This includes the following: (1) Revise all Objective Indicators, baselines &
targets; (2) Revise Outcome Indicators 1.1, 1.3, 1.4, 2.1, 2.2, and 2.4 and associated baselines & targets; and (3) Develop a Theory of Change for the project (if
time and resources permit) as a capacity development exercise for the Project Team & partners and translating the Results Framework into the Myanmar language
[Added: 2019/01/02] [Last Updated: 2019/07/02] |
1. PT / WCS 2. UNDP | 2019/06 | Completed | Project Result Framework has been revised and endorsed by Forest department History | |
| R1.2: Reduce scope of Outcome 1 by formally dropping planned work on national land use planning (Indicator 1.1a) and coastal governance (Indicator 1.1d)
[Added: 2019/01/02] [Last Updated: 2019/07/08] |
1. PT / WCS 2. UNDP 3. FD 4. Project Board | 2019/12 | Completed | Indicators 1.1a and 1.1d were dropped History | |
| R1.3: Add specific indicators for Output 1.4 (a PA system sustainable financing strategy) and Output 2.1 (strengthened management of demonstration PAs through business plans) to ensure progress on these are monitored systematically through the PIRs
[Added: 2019/01/02] [Last Updated: 2019/06/26] |
1. PT / WCS 2. Project Board | 2019/06 | Completed | 1.4 Piloted a feasible sustainable financing mechanism 2.1 Business plan of at least one model PA developed History | |
| R1.5: Update the Environmental and Social Screening undertaken at the time of project approval using the more recent UNDP Social and Environment Screening Procedure (SESP) and ensure that risks reporting including mitigation and management strategies, is harmonized across different processes such as the PIR, QRs and UNDP Risk and Issues Log.
[Added: 2019/01/02] [Last Updated: 2019/10/16] |
1. PT/WCS 2. UNDP | 2019/08 | Completed | SESP has revised according to the feedback received and submitted. History | |
| R1.6 Exclude Hukaung Valley WS from further mandatory monitoring and reporting against Results Framework indicators and targets with approval from the Project Board.Note: Cost-effectiveness of project activities in Hukaung Valley should continue to be monitored by WCS, UNDP and the Project Board
[Added: 2019/01/02] [Last Updated: 2019/06/26] |
1. WCS 2. FD 3. UNDP 4. Project Board | 2019/06 | Completed | Hukaung Valley WS Indicators have been removed History | |
| R1.7: Given delays and other implementation challenges outside the project’s control, request a one-year no-cost extension from the GEF via UNDP
[Added: 2019/01/02] [Last Updated: 2019/06/26] |
1. WCS 2. FD 3. UNDP 4. Project Board | 2019/06 | Completed | Funds not available for additional year of activities. No request for no-cost extension (NCTE )will be made History | |
| R1.4: Consider undertaking a socio-economic mapping of terrestrial ecosystems as an input to PA systems planning to integrate with the ecological gap analysis undertaken under Output 1.6 if time and resources permit
[Added: 2019/01/02] [Last Updated: 2019/07/17] |
1. NPM 2. NPD 3. UNDP | 2019/06 | No Longer Applicable |
[Justification: The MTR recommendation was decided to be beyond the scope of the project. The complications of technical and political ramifications for socio-economic mapping is a dramatic difference form the technical systems being developed for terrestrial ecosystems. The Project Board was informed, and the activity decided to be not applicable.] The complications of technical and political ramifications for socio-economic mapping is a dramatic difference form the technical systems being developed for terrestrial ecosystems. The Project Board was informed, and the activity decided to be not applicable. History |
2. Recommendation:
Recommendation 2 (R2): Prioritize policy-related interventions that are critical to both scale up and sustainability of project impacts and achievable within the available project timeframe, capacity and other resources
Management Response: [Added: 2019/01/02] [Last Updated: 2019/01/02]
Relevant to: Outcome 1, Sustainability
Responsible entities: Project Team/WCS, NWCD, FD
Key Actions:
| Key Action | Responsible | DueDate | Status | Comments | Documents |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2.1: Provide inputs to the rules and regulations that will be developed by the FD to guide the implementation of the new law on Biodiversity & Conservation of PAs to ensure these address key project targets under Outcome 1 (Output 1.1a, 1.1c and 1.1e in particular).
[Added: 2019/01/02] [Last Updated: 2019/06/26] |
1. PT /WCS 2. NPD | 2019/06 | Completed | Biodiversity and Conservation of PA Rules submitted through Forest Department (FD) for formal approval History | |
| R2.2: Develop a Forest Department Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) and/or instruction on PA buffer zone management and use
[Added: 2019/01/02] [Last Updated: 2020/07/07] |
1. PT 2. NWCD 3. FD | 2020/06 | Completed | The finalization and operationalization of these two documents were discussed during the 7th PEB Meeting, and have been incorporated into the Project Exit and Sustainability Strategy History | |
| R2.3: Use project knowledge, experience and tools such as the Village Consultation Process (VCP), the Village Use Zoning Process (VUZP) and the Participatory Land Use Plan (PLUP) to develop a Forest Department SOP and/or instruction on best practices for assessing, recording and managing customary uses and rights in relation to PAs.
[Added: 2019/01/02] [Last Updated: 2020/07/07] |
1. PT 2. NWCD 3. FD | 2020/06 | Completed | The finalization and operationalization of the guidelines have been included in the Project Exit and Sustainability Strategy History | |
| R2.4: Building on the existing 2016 FD instruction on Community Forests, develop an SOP on effective stakeholder engagement to establish Community Forests in PA buffer zones
[Added: 2019/01/02] [Last Updated: 2020/04/02] |
1. PT 2. NWCD 3. FD | 2020/04 | Completed | Discussions about Community Forest and Protected Area Buffer Zones have agreed to follow the existing Community Forest Instruction and the revisions of Community Forest under the Forest Law History | |
| R2.5: Consider developing an SOP or best practice guidelines for establishing and managing a community PA under the forthcoming new law on Biodiversity and Conservation of PAs
[Added: 2019/01/02] [Last Updated: 2020/04/06] |
1. PT 2. NWCD/FD | 2021/06 | Completed | UNDP has contracted independent consultants to document the Community Protected Area (CPA) and Indigenous Peoples’ and Community Conserved Territories and Areas (ICCA) process. Recommendations from this report could inform an future SOP process. History |
3. Recommendation:
Recommendation 3 (R3): Consolidate and streamline capacity development activities and assess their relative impact and cost-effectiveness
Management Response: [Added: 2019/01/02] [Last Updated: 2019/01/02]
Relevant to: Outcome 1, Sustainability
Responsible entities: UNDP, FD, WCS
Key Actions:
| Key Action | Responsible | DueDate | Status | Comments | Documents |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R3.1: Review and finalize draft capacity development strategy and roadmap for NWCD and present to Project Board for approval
[Added: 2019/01/02] [Last Updated: 2019/07/08] |
1. PT / WCS 2. NWCD / FD | 2019/12 | Completed | The strategy has been developed and discussed at the project board meeting and the institutionalized training programs are being conducted for PA staff concurrently. History | |
| R3.3: Obtain feedback on the new certificate and non-certificate training courses and curricula developed by the project from the key government counterparts involved (CFTDC, NWCD, PA staff, MFS, UoFES,)
[Added: 2019/01/02] [Last Updated: 2020/04/06] |
1. UNDP 2. PB | 2020/04 | Completed | Although there is no written feedback, the government is now using the curriculums developed by the project at Myanmar Forest School (MFS), Central Forestry Development Training Centre (CFTDC) and Nature and Wildlife Conservation Division, (NWCD), Forest Department. History | |
| R3.4: Ensure complementarity between the proposed Myanmar Wildlife College and the new training courses developed by the project that will be delivered through existing institutions
[Added: 2019/01/02] [Last Updated: 2020/07/07] |
1. NWCD/FD 2. PB | 2020/06 | Completed | UNDP and WWF are now in direct discussions for the future support of the college under GEF 7. History | |
| R3.2: Assess the relative value and costeffectiveness of different types of capacity development activities under Output 1.3, particularly the delivery of one-off trainings, the
development of new training courses and the institutionalization of new training courses.
[Added: 2019/01/02] [Last Updated: 2020/04/06] |
1. PT / WCS 2. UNDP 3. FD | 2020/03 | No Longer Applicable |
[Justification: Capacity and financial effectiveness were assessed by Nature and Wildlife Conservation Division, (NWCD) staff in HQ, State/Region, but the assessment for new trainings and institutionalization of new training courses cannot be conducted, as no formal written feedback received from FD on these curricula developed.] Capacity and financial effectiveness were assessed by Nature and Wildlife Conservation Division,(NWCD) staff in HQ, State/Region, but the assessment for new trainings and institutionalization of new training courses cannot be conducted, as no formal written feedback received from FD on these curricula developed. History |
4. Recommendation:
Recommendation 4 (R4): Prioritize work on strengthening financial sustainability of the PA system and of the demonstration PAs
Management Response: [Added: 2019/01/02] [Last Updated: 2019/01/02]
Relevant to: Outcome 1 & 2, Sustainability
Responsible entities: Project Team / FD
Key Actions:
| Key Action | Responsible | DueDate | Status | Comments | Documents |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R4.1: Prepare the draft sustainable financing strategy for the PA system, building on the considerable secondary information on PA financing needs that exists already and integrate with the development of MONREC’s broader environmental financing strategy through GRSP
[Added: 2019/01/02] [Last Updated: 2020/06/05] |
1. PT / WCS 2. UNDP | 2020/07 | Completed | A review of financial needs have been completed for protected areas and a complete review of the environment related costs of MONREC. History | |
| R4.2: Integrate business plans for demonstration PAs into the system-wide sustainable financing strategy developed through the project (R4.1)
[Added: 2019/01/02] [Last Updated: 2020/07/07] |
PT / WCS | 2020/07 | Completed | The finalization and operationalization of the Plan were discussed during the 7th PEB Meeting and have been included in the Project Exit and Sustainability Strategy History | |
| R4.3: Finalize and produce a report of the comprehensive scoping undertaken for the Myanmar Biodiversity Conservation Fund, building on scoping work undertaken for the
Environmental Management Fund.
[Added: 2019/01/02] [Last Updated: 2020/04/02] |
PT / WCS | 2020/04 | Completed | Myanmar Biodiversity Conservation Funding Needs Report Completed History | |
| R4.4: With support from UNDP and potentially the PAMCCs, explore options for sustaining promising community engagement models such as CF applications in Htamanthi, Village Use Zoning and Land Use Planning, including microfinance schemes or funding available through other government departments
[Added: 2019/01/02] [Last Updated: 2020/04/28] |
1. PT 2. UNDP 3. FD | 2020/04 | Completed | WCS continues to work on these issues with Sagaing Regional government and Htamanthi Wildlife Sanctuary staff with new financing. History |
5. Recommendation:
Recommendation 5 (R5): Strengthen the sustainability of key project strategies to improve management effectiveness of demonstration PAs
Management Response: [Added: 2019/01/02] [Last Updated: 2019/01/02]
Relevant to: PT, FD, NWCD
Key Actions:
| Key Action | Responsible | DueDate | Status | Comments | Documents |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R5.1: Increase project investment in community participation models (Output 2.3) which is currently very low relative to investment in SMART patrolling.
[Added: 2019/01/02] [Last Updated: 2019/12/22] |
1. NPM 2. NPD 3. UNDP 4. PB | 2019/12 | Completed | WCS has secured an additional 800,000 Euro to support community participation models. This is a long-term commitment by WCS and the FD that will continue beyond the end of the GEF project. History | |
| R5.2 Develop and implement strategies to overcome current problems in Hkakaborazi related to the World Heritage nomination through stakeholder engagement and trust-building activities
[Added: 2019/01/02] [Last Updated: 2019/06/26] |
1. FD 2. WCS 3. UNDP 4. PB | 2019/06 | Completed | Conflict has expanded and activities are currently on hold History | |
| R5.3: Complete business plans for demonstration PAs and link to system-wide PA financing strategy. Note: Ecotourism plan for Hkakaborazi should be integrated in the PA’s business plan.
[Added: 2019/01/02] [Last Updated: 2020/04/28] |
1. PT/WCS 2. FD | 2020/04 | Completed | Business Plan developed for Htamanthi Wildlife Sanctuary. No additional activities for Hkakaborazi. History | |
| R5.4: Identify and implement strategies to improve the quality, analysis and use of SMART patrolling data to monitor threat reduction and other parameters relevant to PA management effectiveness
[Added: 2019/01/02] [Last Updated: 2020/01/07] |
1. PT/WCS 2. FD | 2019/12 | Completed | Training have been conducted for Htmanthi Wild Life Sanctuary History |
6. Recommendation:
Recommendation 6 (R6): Strengthen and expand community engagement on PA management
Management Response: [Added: 2019/01/02] [Last Updated: 2019/01/02]
Relevant to: Outcome 2, Sustainability
Responsible entities: Project Team, WCS, NWCD, FD, UNDP
Key Actions:
| Key Action | Responsible | DueDate | Status | Comments | Documents |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R6.1: Update the original Community Participation Strategy to reflect the needs of ethnic minorities and other marginalized or disadvantaged groups as well as the gender dimension, and adapt to the site-specific conditions in each project demonstration site.
[Added: 2019/01/02] [Last Updated: 2020/04/06] |
1. PT/WCS 2. UNDP | 2020/04 | Completed | The Community Participation Strategy for Htamanthi Wildlife Sanctuary in relation to the Htamanthi Wildlife Sanctuary Management Plan shared with FD. Following the MTR activities were more focused on the needs identified History | |
| R6.4: Manage community expectations in Htamanthi by determining how many more CF applications can realistically be submitted before the project ends and how support to the CF User Groups will be sustained once the project ends.
[Added: 2019/01/02] [Last Updated: 2020/04/06] |
PT /WCS | 2020/04 | Completed | The process for Community Forest (CF) applications is supported across multiple projects. Seven CF user groups were formed and supported for CF application, and three more communities were included in the CF study tour to Loi Nyein in Shan and Wai Maw in Kachin. History | |
| R6.5: Explore practical options for monitoring the impacts of community participation models piloted by the project on PA management effectiveness
[Added: 2019/01/02] [Last Updated: 2020/06/05] |
PT / WCS | 2020/06 | Completed | PA Management Effectiveness were documented in the final Management Effectiveness Tracking Tool (METT). Additional roles are documented and planned for the Htamanthi Wildlife Sanctuary Management Plan History | |
| R6.6: Strengthen integration of gender considerations into activities related to community engagement under Output 2.3 with support from UNDP
[Added: 2019/01/02] [Last Updated: 2019/07/08] |
1. PT / WCS 2. UNDP | 2019/12 | Completed | To strengthen integration of gender considerations into activities related to community engagement under Output 2.3, it has been discussed with project team, WCS and UNDP and advised to have additional training activities. History | |
| R6.2: Identify strategies to include community representatives in the PAMCCs and ensure their effective participation in PAMCC meetings at different levels starting with the township PAMCCs
[Added: 2019/01/02] [Last Updated: 2019/10/16] |
1. PT 2. UNDP 3. FD | 2019/09 | No Longer Applicable |
[Justification: Community representatives will participate in the Sagaing Region PAMCC in March 2019. Next PAMCC has been delayed and may not be continued under the GEF project. New financing will be needed to support the next meeting.] PAMCC has been delayed and may not be continued under the GEF project. New financing will be needed to support the next meeting. History |
|
| R6.3: Build on lessons from Hukaung Valley and Htamanthi to develop and initiate Community Guards and Guardians schemes for Hponkanrazi and Hkakaborazi.
[Added: 2019/01/02] [Last Updated: 2019/07/17] |
1. PT / WCS 2. FD | 2019/06 | No Longer Applicable |
[Justification: Activities in Kachin State were placed on hold due to recent conflict. New Community Guards and Guardians were recruited and therefore not developed.] Activities in Kachin State were placed on hold due to recent conflict. New Community Guards and Guardians were recruited and therefore not developed. History |
7. Recommendation:
Recommendation 7 (R7): Strengthen project ownership across key stakeholder groups at different levels, particularly at subnational level
Management Response: [Added: 2019/01/02] [Last Updated: 2019/01/02]
Relevant to: Outcomes 1 & 2, Implementation & Adaptive Management, Sustainability
Responsible entities: WCS, UNDP, FD
Key Actions:
| Key Action | Responsible | DueDate | Status | Comments | Documents |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R7.2: Develop a simple project Communication Strategy that identifies appropriate messaging for key target audiences to enhance project ownership and sustainability, including ways to effectively communicate the ‘business case’ for PAs and conservation i.e. the relevance of PAs and conservation to wider development objectives
[Added: 2019/01/02] [Last Updated: 2019/07/08] |
PT with guidance from UNDP | 2019/12 | Completed | The Communication Strategy for Sagaing Region has been expanded and will be deployed through the public consultations in line with the Htamanthi WS Management Plan and the Protected Area Management Coordination Committee (PAMCC) History | |
| R7.3: Use PAMCC meetings and similar events to communicate project objectives and business case for conservation and PAs to non-FD government stakeholders in ways that will resonate with them.
[Added: 2019/01/02] [Last Updated: 2019/07/08] |
PT with support from UNDP | 2019/12 | Completed | Communication for Sagaing Region has been expanded and will be deployed through the public consultations in line with the Htamanthi Wildlife Sanctuary (WS) Management Plan and the Protected Area Management Coordination committee (PAMCC) History | |
| R7.4: Make the Community Guardians and Guards programmes a ‘two-way’ process by also sharing feedback on how the biological survey data and SMART patrolling data they collect are being used and incorporating their comments on how to make biological surveys and SMART patrolling more effective.
[Added: 2019/01/02] [Last Updated: 2020/04/02] |
PT / WCS | 2020/04 | Completed | This is integrated into monthly meetings with Community Guardians, Guards and Nature and Wildlife Conservation Division (NWCD) staff. History | |
| R7.5: Leverage UNDP co-financing (e.g. through GRSP) and the UNDP Area Offices in Myitkyina and Mandalay to strengthen synergies between UNDP programmes and the project and to facilitate and strengthen wider subnational government engagement and support for the project
[Added: 2019/01/02] [Last Updated: 2019/07/08] |
UNDP | 2019/12 | Completed | There are several potential synergies with UNDP that are being discussed in Project Board Meeting. History | |
| R7.1: Update original project Stakeholder Involvement Plan.
[Added: 2019/01/02] [Last Updated: 2020/04/30] |
Project Team | 2020/04 | No Longer Applicable |
[Justification: As the project is phasing out and no new activities implemented under this project.] No revised stakeholder involvement plan was developed. Activities focused in Htamanthi WS will continue and be monitored under future projects. History |
8. Recommendation:
Recommendation 8 (R8): Clarify and strengthen project governance and implementation arrangements, including the ability of the Project Board to provide adequate strategic and technical oversight to the project.
Management Response: [Added: 2019/01/02] [Last Updated: 2019/01/02]
Relevant to: Project implementation & adaptive management, Sustainability
Key Actions:
| Key Action | Responsible | DueDate | Status | Comments | Documents |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R8.1: Ensure the PB meets at least twice a year and more often if needed so that key project decisions are discussed and formally approved and recorded
[Added: 2019/01/02] [Last Updated: 2020/01/06] |
NPM § NPD § UNDP | 2019/12 | Completed | In 2019, Project board meeting has conducted 3 times ( Jan, July and Dec) History | |
| R8.2: Increase emphasis of project planning, monitoring and reporting on delivery of higherlevel results and sustainable impacts
[Added: 2019/01/02] [Last Updated: 2019/07/08] |
1. PT/WCS, 2. UNDP 3. PB | 2019/12 | Completed | Revised reporting mechanisms with UNDP and increased communication on delivery of higher level results and sustainable impacts History | |
| R8.3: Clarify role and functions of the PMC including its relationship to the PB.
[Added: 2019/01/02] [Last Updated: 2020/01/05] |
1. NPM 2. NPD 3. UNDP 4. PB | 2019/12 | Completed | UNDP has expanded their function in relation to perpetration to the Project Board. NPD’s activities are still limited by time availability. Coordination and time management continue to be challenges. History | |
| R8.4: Clarify and document how TAGPA’s role and functions as intended in the original project design are to be met. (These functions are to serve as a mechanism for providing technical support on PAs to the project and thereafter to NWCD and to update national stakeholders about project progress and sharing lessons.) This includes:
§ Reviewing membership of TAGPA to identify and fill any gaps in expertise relevant to PA planning, establishment and management
§ Increasing efficiency by only involving a subset of relevant experts from TAGPA in technical consultations and events as needed on a case by case basis
[Added: 2019/01/02] [Last Updated: 2020/04/30] |
1. PT 2. NPD 3. FD 4. UNDP | 2020/04 | Completed | The revised TOR for the TAGPA was developed and shared in December 2019. No comments and feedback were received and there is no interest from NWCD to continue this process. History | |
| R8.5: Ensure continuity in oversight of the project by UNDP and that the UNDP project focal point has the necessary technical and management skills to support the project effectively and to coordinate with government and other stakeholders.
[Added: 2019/01/02] [Last Updated: 2019/06/26] |
1. UNDP 2. PB | 2019/06 | Completed | Recent UNDP staff have an expanding role in the technical and management skills of the project. History | |
| R8.6: Ensure all key strategic and adaptive management decisions regarding the project are formally approved and recorded at PB meetings (e.g the decision to scale back work at Hukaung Valley and Hkakaborazi.)
[Added: 2019/01/02] [Last Updated: 2019/06/26] |
1. WCS 2. UNDP 3. FD 4. PB | 2019/06 | Completed | Decisions are documented at the PB and documented in the PB meeting minutes. History |
9. Recommendation:
Recommendation 9 (R9): Strengthen project adaptive management and staff capacities, particularly with respect to gender mainstreaming, M&E, technical reporting and communication to different stakeholder groups
Management Response: [Added: 2019/01/02] [Last Updated: 2019/01/02]
Relevant to: Project implementation & adaptive management, Outcomes 1 & 2, Sustainability
Responsible entities: NPM and other PT senior staff /WCS, UNDP
Key Actions:
| Key Action | Responsible | DueDate | Status | Comments | Documents |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R9.1: Increase staff capacity for monitoring, critical analysis and reporting on higher-level results and impacts rather than activities.
[Added: 2019/01/02] [Last Updated: 2019/06/26] |
1. PT/WCS, 2. UNDP 3. PB | 2019/06 | Completed | Capacity building activities for 2019 project activities and documentation has been recorded History | |
| R9.2: Provide additional training to senior project staff on the different reporting requirements, formats and processes (PIRs, QRs, tracking tools, scorecards, risk monitoring, etc.) to increase their understanding and ownership of these processes
[Added: 2019/01/02] [Last Updated: 2019/10/16] |
1. PT / WCS 2. UNDP | 2019/07 | Completed | Online training for PIR was completed. In house training for M&E completed. History | |
| R9.3: Strengthen project staff capacity to integrate gender considerations into project and to monitor and report on the impacts of this going beyond numbers of men and women participants at events.
[Added: 2019/01/02] [Last Updated: 2020/04/06] |
UNDP | 2020/03 | Completed | Future activities have been discussed with UNDP but no additional Gender training opportunities are expected. History | |
| R9.4: Develop a simple project M&E strategy based on the Results Framework for the remainder of the project and ensure that there is periodic monitoring and reporting against this by key project team members (the Landscape and Site and Assistant Site Coordinators and Thematic Team Leaders)
[Added: 2019/01/02] [Last Updated: 2019/06/26] |
1. NPM / WCS 2. NPD 3. UNDP | 2019/06 | Completed | UNDP M&E Structures have been adopted for project use. History | |
| R9.5: Harmonize monitoring and reporting across different tools and processes including the PIRs, QRs, Risk Logs and Tracking Tools (i.e. the Capacity Development Scorecard, the Financial Sustainability Scorecard and the Management Effectiveness Tracking Tool)
[Added: 2019/01/02] [Last Updated: 2020/02/03] |
1. PT 2. UNDP | 2020/01 | Completed | Capacity Development Scorecard attached History | |
| R9.6: Document lessons learned, best practices and develop some specific knowledge products based on project experiences in both English and Myanmar language.
[Added: 2019/01/02] [Last Updated: 2020/07/07] |
1. PT/WCS 2. UNDP | 2020/06 | Completed | Incorporated in Project Exit and Sustainability Strategy History | |
| R9.7: Clarify roles and TORs of NPM and CTA in the project going forward, given changes in the circumstances of both
[Added: 2019/01/02] [Last Updated: 2019/06/26] |
1. WCS 2. UNDP | 2019/06 | Completed | NPM has been replaced, CTA is continuing in his earlier role History |
10. Recommendation:
Recommendation 10 (R10): Strengthen replication and scale-up of project results
Management Response: [Added: 2019/01/02] [Last Updated: 2019/01/02]
Relevant to: Sustainability
Responsible entities: PT/WCS, UNDP, FD
Key Actions:
| Key Action | Responsible | DueDate | Status | Comments | Documents |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R10.1: Identify the socio-economic and political barriers to further expansion of the terrestrial PA system as well as potential strategies to overcome these, as well as new approaches and opportunities for PA establishment and management
[Added: 2019/01/02] [Last Updated: 2020/07/07] |
1. PT / WCS 2. NWCD / FD 3. NDP | 2020/06 | Completed | This is documented in the "GEF-ICCA Thought Piece” contracted directly through UNDP. History | |
| R10.2 Identify mechanisms to integrate socioeconomic considerations alongside ecological criteria into PA planning, management and further expansion of the terrestrial PA system
[Added: 2019/01/02] [Last Updated: 2020/07/07] |
1. PT / WCS 2. NWCD / FD 3. UNDP | 2020/07 | Completed | This is documented in the "GEF-ICCA Thought Piece” contracted directly through UNDP. History | |
| R10.3: Develop a project exit strategy that identifies options for continuing and scaling up key project results (e.g. on PA financing, SMART patrolling, Community Guards, Community Guardians, Community Forestry) at project demonstration sites and replicating successful strategies in other PAs.
[Added: 2019/01/02] [Last Updated: 2020/07/07] |
1. PT / WCS 2. UNDP | 2020/06 | Completed | Project Exit and Sustainability Strategy was endorsed by 7th PEB Meeting on 19 June 2020. History |