DEVELOPMENT PLANNING, COORDINATION AND MONITOING PROJECT

Report Cover Image
Evaluation Plan:
2010-2011, Mozambique
Evaluation Type:
Project
Planned End Date:
12/2010
Completion Date:
01/2010
Status:
Completed
Management Response:
Yes
Evaluation Budget(US $):
20,000

Share

Document Type Language Size Status Downloads
Download document Development Planning Project Evaluation- TERMS OF REFERENCE- FINAL.doc tor English 65.50 KB Posted 767
Download document DEVELOPMENT PLANNING FINAL REPORT report English 313.62 KB Posted 7331
Title DEVELOPMENT PLANNING, COORDINATION AND MONITOING PROJECT
Atlas Project Number:
Evaluation Plan: 2010-2011, Mozambique
Evaluation Type: Project
Status: Completed
Completion Date: 01/2010
Planned End Date: 12/2010
Management Response: Yes
Focus Area:
  • 1. Poverty and MDG
  • 2. Democratic Governance
Corporate Outcome and Output (UNDP Strategic Plan 2014-2017)
  • 1. Strengthened national capacities to integrate into the global economic system and to negotiate and manage traditional & emerging development finance for inclusive development
  • 2. Civil society, including civil society organizations and voluntary associations, and the private sector contribute to the MDGs in support of national planning strategies and policies
  • 3. Access to information policies support accountability and transparency
  • 4. National, regional and local levels of governance expand their capacities to reduce conflict and manage the equitable delivery of public services
  • 5. Strengthened capacities of national human rights institutions
  • 6. Strengthened national-, regional- and local-level capacity to implement anti-corruption initiatives
Evaluation Budget(US $): 20,000
Source of Funding: 55187
Joint Programme: No
Joint Evaluation: No
Evaluation Team members:
Name Title Email Nationality
Alice Madeira/Gabriel Dava and Consultant Team Leader
GEF Evaluation: No
Key Stakeholders: MINEC, MPD, donors
Countries: MOZAMBIQUE
Comments: Strategic Plan Results Area - Poverty Reduction MDGs; Partners: MINEC and MPD
Lessons
Findings
Recommendations
1 De-concentration of project interventions to the level of provinces to enable that capacity building in the area of development coordination, planning and monitoring be extended to province and the district levels.
2 More systematic drafting and formalisation of project meeting minutes.
3 Urgent dissemination of the cooperation policy
4 Review of the project objectives and goals
5 Creation of a budget line to fund the Development Observatories
6 CS Project IPs should include in their activities preparation of CSOs in the Observatories from districts to the province level
7 Establishment of single coordination of the project by MPD
8 Harmonization of the planning and monitoring system with PARPA and MDGs should not only be for chosen ministries but for all ministries, giving priority to those deemed priority sectors. Thus, the project should give priority to the increase of the capacity of officers of those ministries as well as of their directors in results based planning/management to strengthen even more the integration of the planning and monitoring instruments as an orientation towards results
9 Establish a close relation with the UNDP Civil Society Organizations Empowerment project implemented in partnership with the Grupo Moçambicano da Dívida and Fundação para o Desenvolvimento da Comunidade
10 It is fundamental that the project reassumes as priority the introduction in tertiary education institutions of subjects pertaining to results based management as a means to guarantee that future planning officers are already skilled in this area
11 Coordination between MPD/PNUD/UNICEF in annual planning
12 The quality of annual plans should be improved to ensure that they reflect the real needs and proposed activities should be effectively carried out.
1. Recommendation: De-concentration of project interventions to the level of provinces to enable that capacity building in the area of development coordination, planning and monitoring be extended to province and the district levels.
Management Response: [Added: 2011/04/28]

Agreed. In the next UNDAF starting in 2012, the project interventions will be focused to a number of selected provinces

Key Actions:

2. Recommendation: More systematic drafting and formalisation of project meeting minutes.
Management Response: [Added: 2011/04/28]

Agreed. There have been notes taken in all project meetings, but they are not formalized (signed by all participants) and filed. This is an irregularity that will be duly corrected.

Key Actions:

3. Recommendation: Urgent dissemination of the cooperation policy
Management Response: [Added: 2011/04/28]

The project is ready to finance the dissemination of the policy and the strategy for dissemination was agreed with MINEC. However, due to MINEC internal capacity (at project level), the planned activities were not carried in 2010 as planned and were postponed to take place in 2011.

Key Actions:

4. Recommendation: Review of the project objectives and goals
Management Response: [Added: 2011/04/28]

Agreed. The project was designed in 2007 to end in 2009, but was further extended up to 2011. Some of the objectives and targets need to be revisited as the context has changed. They will be adjusted as part of preparation of the new UNDAF.

Key Actions:

5. Recommendation: Creation of a budget line to fund the Development Observatories
Management Response: [Added: 2011/04/28]

The 2011 AWP already include a budget for funding DO logistics at provincial level. However, budget is limited as the logistical component was not originally planned in the PRODOC. UNICEF has agreed to complement the funding for DO logistics at provincial level.

Key Actions:

6. Recommendation: CS Project IPs should include in their activities preparation of CSOs in the Observatories from districts to the province level
Management Response: [Added: 2011/04/28]

The CS Project IPs to build capacity of CSOs at local level to participate in the DOs, but they are not able to cover all districts and all CSOs. There is a need to prioritize and coordinate with MPD

Key Actions:

7. Recommendation: Establishment of single coordination of the project by MPD
Management Response: [Added: 2011/04/28]

This was the case in the past, but MINEC insisted to have a separate project. This has demonstrated to be inefficient given the low volume of transactions and activities performed by MINEC

Key Actions:

8. Recommendation: Harmonization of the planning and monitoring system with PARPA and MDGs should not only be for chosen ministries but for all ministries, giving priority to those deemed priority sectors. Thus, the project should give priority to the increase of the capacity of officers of those ministries as well as of their directors in results based planning/management to strengthen even more the integration of the planning and monitoring instruments as an orientation towards results
Management Response: [Added: 2011/04/28]

This is true, but this will depend on the priorities defined in the new UNDAF and CPD. It will also depend on the resources availability for the project, otherwise it will be only for selected Ministries, particularly taking into account the prior recommendation to de-concentrate functions.

Key Actions:

9. Recommendation: Establish a close relation with the UNDP Civil Society Organizations Empowerment project implemented in partnership with the Grupo Moçambicano da Dívida and Fundação para o Desenvolvimento da Comunidade
Management Response: [Added: 2011/04/28]

Agreed. The two projects aim at the same objective, but looking at two different ends, one the Government end and the other, the CSO end. During 2011 the Management will seek more collaboration between the two projects.

Key Actions:

10. Recommendation: It is fundamental that the project reassumes as priority the introduction in tertiary education institutions of subjects pertaining to results based management as a means to guarantee that future planning officers are already skilled in this area
Management Response: [Added: 2011/04/28]

As the project is coming to an end, it is not likely that it will be possible to implement that recommendation. For the coming years, will depend on the priorities in the new UNDAF and CPD

Key Actions:

11. Recommendation: Coordination between MPD/PNUD/UNICEF in annual planning
Management Response: [Added: 2011/04/28]

Agreed. It is necessary to clarify roles and responsibilities between the two agencies

Key Actions:

12. Recommendation: The quality of annual plans should be improved to ensure that they reflect the real needs and proposed activities should be effectively carried out.
Management Response: [Added: 2011/04/28]

Agreed, but at the time of report completion, the Plans had already finalized and approved. However, the recommendation is taken for the next planning cycle.

Key Actions:

Latest Evaluations

Contact us

1 UN Plaza
DC1-20th Floor
New York, NY 10017
Tel. +1 646 781 4200
Fax. +1 646 781 4213
erc.support@undp.org