The Chibuto Millenium Village Evaluation Report

Report Cover Image
Evaluation Plan:
2010-2011, Mozambique
Evaluation Type:
Project
Planned End Date:
03/2010
Completion Date:
01/2010
Status:
Completed
Management Response:
Yes
Evaluation Budget(US $):
001

Share

Document Type Language Size Status Downloads
Download document Lumbo Chibuto consultant ToR PR draft.docx tor English 26.10 KB Posted 819
Download document Evaluation_Report_CHIBUTO_2010_english27.04.2011[1].pdf report English 636.66 KB Posted 886
Title The Chibuto Millenium Village Evaluation Report
Atlas Project Number:
Evaluation Plan: 2010-2011, Mozambique
Evaluation Type: Project
Status: Completed
Completion Date: 01/2010
Planned End Date: 03/2010
Management Response: Yes
Focus Area:
  • 1. Poverty and MDG
Corporate Outcome and Output (UNDP Strategic Plan 2014-2017)
  • 1. Capacities of national and local institutions enhanced to scale up proven MDG acceleration interventions and to plan, monitor, report and evaluate the MDG progress in the context of related national development priorities
Evaluation Budget(US $): 001
Source of Funding: 56048
Joint Programme: No
Joint Evaluation: No
Evaluation Team members:
Name Title Email Nationality
Amilcar Pereira Team Leader
GEF Evaluation: No
Key Stakeholders: MCT, UN agencies, Chibuto
Countries: MOZAMBIQUE
Comments: Strategic Plan Areas - Democratic Governance; Partners - MSC
Lessons
Findings
Recommendations
1 Given the nature of the program, which seeks to bring about meaningful changes in communities it is imperative to revise the program in order for each village to have a clear and logical plan for each year, which includes objectives and performance indicators. This will allow knowing what key findings of the program are and how to achieve them.
2 It is essential that steps be taken to design a system for monitoring and evaluation to accurately measure the progress and impact of the program. The same system will contribute for various program?s partners to know the results achieved so far in a transparent and objective ways.
3 The roles of the CNPVM, CRCT and CVL must be clarified to ensure better communication and coordination in the implementation of the program. Additionally, the role of the CRCT must be strengthened and more resources allocated to the CVL so that it has better participation in the program implementation.
4 The CNPVM should review how it conducts supervision by identifying more efficient ways. Currently the program presents higher supervision and travel expenses. Probably the CRCT overseeing role should be strengthened in order to reduce supervision costs.
5 Considering that the village of Chibuto works with a population of 13,000 inhabitants there is a need to rethink on a strategy to raise more funds and partnerships to respond to the growing number of beneficiaries in various components of the program.
6 The program must develop effective mechanisms for participation via the CDL in order to strengthen community involvement.
1. Recommendation: Given the nature of the program, which seeks to bring about meaningful changes in communities it is imperative to revise the program in order for each village to have a clear and logical plan for each year, which includes objectives and performance indicators. This will allow knowing what key findings of the program are and how to achieve them.
Management Response: [Added: 2014/03/31]

The project has closed. The CO will take this recommendation into consideration for its future planning of similar interventions.

Key Actions:

2. Recommendation: It is essential that steps be taken to design a system for monitoring and evaluation to accurately measure the progress and impact of the program. The same system will contribute for various program?s partners to know the results achieved so far in a transparent and objective ways.
Management Response: [Added: 2014/03/31]

The CO will make efforts to improve its planning, monitoring and evaluation phases of the projects.

Key Actions:

3. Recommendation: The roles of the CNPVM, CRCT and CVL must be clarified to ensure better communication and coordination in the implementation of the program. Additionally, the role of the CRCT must be strengthened and more resources allocated to the CVL so that it has better participation in the program implementation.
Management Response: [Added: 2014/03/31]

The project has closed. The CO will take this recommendation into consideration for its future planning of similar interventions.

Key Actions:

4. Recommendation: The CNPVM should review how it conducts supervision by identifying more efficient ways. Currently the program presents higher supervision and travel expenses. Probably the CRCT overseeing role should be strengthened in order to reduce supervision costs.
Management Response: [Added: 2014/03/31]

The project has closed. The CO will take this recommendation into consideration for its future planning of similar interventions.

Key Actions:

5. Recommendation: Considering that the village of Chibuto works with a population of 13,000 inhabitants there is a need to rethink on a strategy to raise more funds and partnerships to respond to the growing number of beneficiaries in various components of the program.
Management Response: [Added: 2014/03/31]

The project has closed. The CO will take this recommendation into consideration for its future planning of similar interventions.

Key Actions:

6. Recommendation: The program must develop effective mechanisms for participation via the CDL in order to strengthen community involvement.
Management Response: [Added: 2014/03/31]

The project has closed. The CO will take this recommendation into consideration for its future planning of similar interventions.

Key Actions:

Latest Evaluations

Contact us

1 UN Plaza
DC1-20th Floor
New York, NY 10017
Tel. +1 646 781 4200
Fax. +1 646 781 4213
erc.support@undp.org