- Evaluation Plan:
- 2013-2019, Liberia
- Evaluation Type:
- Mid Term Outcome
- Planned End Date:
- 09/2013
- Completion Date:
- 10/2013
- Status:
- Completed
- Management Response:
- Yes
- Evaluation Budget(US $):
- 15,000
Mid-Term Evaluation of the Justice & Security Trust Fund
| Document | Type | Language | Size | Status | Downloads |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 JSJP-JSTF mid-term eval Final[1].pdf |
report | English | 1951.46 KB | Posted | 1001 |
| Title | Mid-Term Evaluation of the Justice & Security Trust Fund | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Atlas Project Number: | 00076186 | |||||||||
| Evaluation Plan: | 2013-2019, Liberia | |||||||||
| Evaluation Type: | Mid Term Outcome | |||||||||
| Status: | Completed | |||||||||
| Completion Date: | 10/2013 | |||||||||
| Planned End Date: | 09/2013 | |||||||||
| Management Response: | Yes | |||||||||
| Focus Area: |
|
|||||||||
| Corporate Outcome and Output (UNDP Strategic Plan 2018-2021) |
|
|||||||||
| Evaluation Budget(US $): | 15,000 | |||||||||
| Source of Funding: | PBF | |||||||||
| Joint Programme: | No | |||||||||
| Joint Evaluation: | No | |||||||||
| Evaluation Team members: |
|
|||||||||
| GEF Evaluation: | No | |||||||||
| Key Stakeholders: | PBF | |||||||||
| Countries: | LIBERIA |
| Lessons | |
|---|---|
| Findings |
| Recommendations | |
|---|---|
| 1 | Trust fund structure and resources should be made up to match both the transformation ambitions of the Agenda and the complexities and diversity of interests in the JSJP itself. In order to achieve this we recommend for a justice and security trust fund to have separate bodies for respectively governance and management, as is now common practice in Europe in both public and private sector. |
| 2 | With respect to PBF our recommendation is that it should have a role equal to that of other contributors, i.e. it should channel its funds through the trust fund on equal terms with Government and donors. With respect to UNDP our recommendation is for it to serve, not as the only but as an alternative source of implementation management service for trust fund recipients and contributing organizations. |
1. Recommendation: Trust fund structure and resources should be made up to match both the transformation ambitions of the Agenda and the complexities and diversity of interests in the JSJP itself. In order to achieve this we recommend for a justice and security trust fund to have separate bodies for respectively governance and management, as is now common practice in Europe in both public and private sector.
Management Response: [Added: 2014/03/05]
All recommendations related to the Trust fund structure are noted. Efforts are being made to review the structure and align to AfT.
Key Actions:
| Key Action | Responsible | DueDate | Status | Comments | Documents |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Task force was established for initial review. TOR was subsequently developed to solicit expert advice.
[Added: 2014/03/05] |
Ministry of Justice (MOJ) | 2014/04 | Overdue-Initiated |
2. Recommendation: With respect to PBF our recommendation is that it should have a role equal to that of other contributors, i.e. it should channel its funds through the trust fund on equal terms with Government and donors. With respect to UNDP our recommendation is for it to serve, not as the only but as an alternative source of implementation management service for trust fund recipients and contributing organizations.
Management Response: [Added: 2014/03/05]
There exists a standing global MOU that all funds are channeled through the MDTF. No further action required.
Key Actions:
| Key Action | Responsible | DueDate | Status | Comments | Documents |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No further action required. refer to management's response
[Added: 2014/03/05] |
No due date | No deadline established |